Tibet is a country that is located in southwestern China. It is definitely a story with a very very sad. The struggle between China and Tibet in existence since many centuries and even today there is a conflict. As we know China is a very conservative country and another country 's agreement with the' review of China, then it is treated badly. It is true that the rules are very strict in China, but is right to wage war against another country, instead of trying a less violent? I think that every minority in a country in our world should have the co-management of power, otherwise it is logical that a conflict becomes unavoidable. But why is it so? Why are the heads of state, especially in China and Japan, have a closed-minded and think only of themselves? There are so many global problems that can be addressed only through cooperation among all countries of the world, such as the problem of our climate.
I think that what happens in Tibet by China is unbearable without freedom of opinion and freedom of religion without life is sad. Tibet is not a ball with which you can do everything. No! Tibet is a country where people live in China, and then do not understand why they do not receive the same laws as those that exist in China, though in theory part of that state. Yes, I know very well that there is only conflict in this world, there are many conflicts in which a strong country wages war against a minority. I think that we should think from a global perspective and not local. Even our politicians can help countries abused, but not limited to politicians, we, too, everyone has a right to say 'opinion, and only together can we build the world capable of reducing the conflicts on our planet earth.
I think that what happens in Tibet by China is unbearable without freedom of opinion and freedom of religion without life is sad. Tibet is not a ball with which you can do everything. No! Tibet is a country where people live in China, and then do not understand why they do not receive the same laws as those that exist in China, though in theory part of that state. Yes, I know very well that there is only conflict in this world, there are many conflicts in which a strong country wages war against a minority. I think that we should think from a global perspective and not local. Even our politicians can help countries abused, but not limited to politicians, we, too, everyone has a right to say 'opinion, and only together can we build the world capable of reducing the conflicts on our planet earth.
In summer ' in 1949 the Chinese military has begun to conquer Tibet. When the Tibetan people have made an 'uprising, China has occupied. This cost the lives of 90,000 Tibetans. China Tibet needed because the area of \u200b\u200bthe chain of 'Himalaya was militarily important. Today, in the 21st century, the most important cause for the 'Employment and water. Tibet has many rivers, which can make the throat to China, as for the supply of water for its huge population.
The influence of China in Tibet is increasing day by day, because there are more and more Chinese in Tibet. Thus, many more Chinese living in Tibet and Tibetans. China regularly invites representatives of "politics" of Tibet, the Dalai Lama, in Beijing for negotiations, but an 'independence for Tibet is still a distant vision.
To have power over the people of Tibet, the Chinese occupy all the positions of the most important policy. Even the shops and all other sectors of the economy in the hands of the Chinese. So the Tibetans are increasingly removed, leaving them at the mercy of the will of China. It would be important for China to propose a compromise. The Tibetans are definitely in favor that the Chinese use a portion of their water because they do not need that much. In return, China should give them the 'independence, accepting their culture and supporting their religion.
and Manuel Elisa N.
0 comments:
Post a Comment